Rethinking Engagement and
Storytelling in Anti-Trafficking Work:

A Survivor-Led Conversation

This webinar featured three survivors of human trafficking who shared their perspectives on anti-trafficking work and ethical engagement of survivors.

The focus was on their analysis of anti-trafficking efforts, not on their personal stories or trauma.

“What would you like people to know when you are invited to speak or participate in an anti-trafficking event or project?”

No one survivor speaks for all other survivors.

Survivors are multidimensional individuals and should not be confined to one type of participation based on assumptions about them and their experience.

“One thing specifically… the difference between trafficking and survival sex work—that’s really important to educate yourself on.”

– Carina

No survivor should be expected to provide a simple solution for ending human trafficking despite a social preoccupation with a “quick fix”.
Survivors are more than just what happened to them “in the middle” of their trafficking experience. What happened before and after their experience also matters.

“How do you work in anti-trafficking spaces when people don’t always agree?”

Different moral or political perspectives shouldn’t matter when the main objective is to support survivors.

“Just because I don’t agree with someone’s choice doesn’t make it any less valid.”

– Jess

I champion different perspectives, but they have to be rooted in respect.
Being Indigenous has impacted my experiences. Many people don’t know enough about this perspective, so I spend a lot of effort educating people about it.

“Sometimes, survivors are asked to meet specific requirements to take part in anti-trafficking work. What are your general thoughts about these requirements, and what are your recommendations for agencies that have requirements?”

Regarding ‘requirements’ for survivors—who is not ready to engage, the survivor or the agency?

“It’s almost like, as soon as you’re a survivor of human trafficking, well now there’s…these new requirements, but if I were applying for…a regular job and didn’t have to disclose, those requirements wouldn’t even exist.”

– Krystal

Why ‘years out of trafficking’ is not a good measure of safety or stability in a survivor’s life.

An agency can engage well with a survivor by giving more creative control and having fewer requirements.

“What types of support do you need from agencies, before, during, and after your participation? What kind of support would you like to see that’s not typically offered?”

Survivors deserve adequate preparation and constructive feedback when they engage with an organization.

“Be mindful how you treat survivors who are willing to do the work in this space.”

– Gracia

Survivor engagement is often an afterthought. Compensation should be fair and offered in the same way as with any other expert or professional.

Survivors are whole people and don’t want to be constantly analyzed.

It’s important to give survivors choices and be clear and proactive about what support is available.

“What are your recommendations for agencies that strongly believe in one particular perspective?”

Agencies can move past stereotypes and reach more people who need support.

“Pull up some more chairs, go ask some more survivors, get different perspectives.”

– Jess

English (Canada)